The San Francisco Chronicle has an article on the growth of blog based publishing companies. I was interviewed by Chronicle reporter Sam Zuckerman several times and I'm quoted in this story. Being part of the this process reminded me why I like the mainstream media and professional journalism.
Based on when Sam first contacted me, the story was developed over a period of a couple of weeks. His research included talking to multiple sources with a variety of backgrounds. The story includes several views on the growth of professional blogs and presents the information in a reasonably unbiased way. The story is professionally written and reads that way.
Let's compare that with the average blog post - this post will work. I've spent about 10 minutes on this. I've done no research except for reading the article. I'm in no way even considering being unbiased, and this post is written by a amateur who finds writing good hard.
It's not difficult for me to decide which approach does a better job reporting news and information.
This is not to say all blogs should be written by professional journalists and/or held to professional journalistic standards. Many blogs are fun to read because they aren't professionally done, or because of their biases. But my personal hope is as the blog industry grows and matures more blogs - and especially blogs that focus on news and information - employ the methods of professional journalism.